Hargadine v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
1888
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 1986 · most notably Union Nat Bank of Chicago v. Bank of Kansas City (1890), Alberger v. National Bank of Commerce (1894)
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Crow v. Beardsley · 5 Ohio St. 124 - Hoffman, Burneston & Co. v. Mackall · Cooper v. Brock · Schradski v. Albright · Watterman, Star & Co. v. Silberberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If from the nature of the instrument, either standing alone or read in the light of the surrounding circumstances, it appears to have been given as a security, it must be considered as a mortgage, and the law will apply thereto the rules applicable to mortgages” (p. 386).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.