Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

97 Mo. 79

Davis v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1888

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1888-10-15

<p>Mon-survival of Action for Personal Injuries: practice. An action for personal injuries cannot, after the death of the defendant, be revived in the name of his' administrator. (R. S. 187&, secs. 96, 97).</p>

Relies on Stanley v. Bircher's

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Stricken from the docket · Decided 1888-10-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1926

7 state decisions

4018881890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Sherwood, J.

¶1This action was brought for personal injuries caused to plaintiff by the fall of a house owned by Robert Gf. Shaw. Such proceedings were had in the circuit court as compelled plaintiff to take a nonsuit and he has appealed here. During the present term, the death of the defendant has been suggested, and by consent, the administrator has been made a party to the action.

¶2The merits of this cause cannot be discussed, since the action was for personal injuries, and judgment for the defendant, who, since appeal taken, has died. -The action, by reason of defendant’s death, abated, and could not be revived in the name of his administrator. R. S. 1879, secs. 96, 97. The maxim, “ actio personalis moritur cum persona” applies, and our statute, so far as concerns this case, is only declaratory of the common law. Stanley v. Bircher's Ex’r, 78 Mo. 245; 1 Chitty Pl. 77, and cas. cit.

¶3Inasmuch as the -action has abated, the cause will be stricken from the docket.

All concur.
/97/mo/79 · .json · Public domain