Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Mont. 328 - Simpson v. Miller

Simpson v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
July 1969
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Autio v. Miller · Burns v. Eminger · Morris v. Standard Oil Co. · Grant v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. · Wise v. Stagg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The former verdict or other decision may be vacated and a new trial granted, on the application of the party aggrieved, for any of the following causes, materially affecting the substantial rights of such party: "1. Irregularity in the proceedings of the court, jury, or adverse party, or any order of the court, or abuse of discretion, by which either party was prevented from having a fair trial; "2. Misconduct of the jury; and whenever any one or more of the jurors have been induced to assent to any general or special verdict, or to a finding on any question submitted to them by the court, by a resort to the determination of chance, such misconduct may be proved by the affidavit of any one of the jurors; "3. Accident or surprise, which ordinary prudence could not have guarded against; "4. Newly discovered evidence, material for the party making the application, which he could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered and produced at the trial; "5. Excessive damages, appearing to have been given under the influence of passion or prejudice; "6. Insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict or other decision, or that it is against law; "7. Error in law, occurring at the trial and excepted to by the party making the application; "8. That the right to have a bill of exceptions has been lost, either through the death or incapacity of the court reporter or in any manner that was not the fault of the losing party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.