Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

97 Neb. 118

Jankee v. Robb

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1914

Nebraska Supreme Court · decided 1914-10-30

<p>Adverse Possession: Sufficiency of Evidence. The evidence, indicated in the opinion, is found to be sufficient to establish the defense of open, exclusive and adverse possession for more than ten years prior to the commencement of the action. ■</p>

Affirmed · Decided 1914-10-30

Sedgwick, J.

¶1The plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Duel county to quiet title to a quarter section of land in that county. The defendants claimed title under the same foreclosure proceedings involved in Armstrong v. Johnson, p. 119, post. The trial court found for the defendants and dismissed the action, and plaintiff has appealed.

¶2It is not necessary in this case to discuss the validity of the foreclosure proceeding relied upon by the defendants,, since the defendants have alleged and proved a complete defense by adverse possession. In 1898 the defendant Samuel Robb was the owner of and resided upon a quarter sec*119tion of land adjoining the land in dispute, and also controlled by lease several other adjoining quarters, and in that year, or the following year, he enclosed the said quarter sections of land so owned and leased by him, and also this quarter section in controversy, with a fence, and has ever since that time had exclusive adverse possession of all the lands so enclosed, including this quarter. In January, 1901, one or two years after he had so enclosed and taken possession of this land, he purchased the quarter in controversy at sheriff’s sale, and has since paid the taxes thereon. Since this action was not begun until in March, 1911, the defendants had been in open, exclusive and aid-verse possession under claim of ownership for more than ten years when the action was begun.

¶3The judgment of the district court is therefore right, and is

¶4• Affirmed.

Rose, J., not sitting.
/97/neb/118 · .json · Public domain