Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Nev. 363 - Wood v. State

Wood v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 1989
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Hawk · United States v. Heiden · Boggs v. State · Crockett v. State · Howard v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that it could be reasonably anticipated that the evidence sought would be exculpatory and material to appellant’s defense. ... It is not sufficient that the showing disclose merely a hoped-for conclusion from examination of the destroyed evidence, nor is it sufficient for the defendant to show only that examination of the evidence would be helpful in preparing his defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.