Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

97 Nev. 450

Knapp v. Lemieux

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1981

Nevada Supreme Court · decided 1981-10-13

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1982

2 state decisions

Relies on Pizza Hut, Inc. v. Dolan · Las Vegas Sun, Inc. v. Nelson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1981-10-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*451OPINION

Per Curiam:

¶2This is an appeal from a default judgment and from orders denying appellants’ request to vacate the judgment. Appellants filed a timely opening brief, but respondents have not filed an answering brief. NRAP 31(a). On June 9, 1981, we ordered respondents to show cause why their failure to file a brief should not be treated as a confession of error. In response to our order, counsel for respondents filed an affidavit which neither sets forth sufficient reasons for the failure to file an answering brief, nor demonstrates good cause why that failure should not be treated as a confession of error.

¶3Having reviewed appellants’ brief, the record on appeal, and counsel’s affidavit, we elect to treat respondents’ failure to file an answering brief as a confession of error. NRAP 31(c); see Las Vegas Sun, Inc. v. Nelson, 96 Nev. 825, 619 P.2d 534 (1980).

¶4The default judgment and the order denying vacation of the judgment are reversed. This case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

/97/nev/450 · .json · Public domain