Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 N.J. 178 - State v. Kelly

State v. Kelly’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

517
cited by 517 later decisions
27
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 6 district · 497 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 517 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Cesare v. Cesare (1998), 460 So. 2d 778 - May v. State (1984)

4 federal appellate · 6 district · 497 state decisions — followed in 27 states

22901984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Washington v. Texas · Webb v. Texas · State v. Roth · State v. MacOn · Massiah v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 517 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the intended testimony must concern a subject matter that is beyond the ken of the average juror; (2) the field testified to must be at a state of the art such that an expert's testimony could be sufficiently reliable; and (3) the witness must have sufficient expertise to offer the intended testimony.”
    44 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) by expert testimony as to the general acceptance, among those in the profession, of the premises on which the proffered expert witness based his or her analysis; (2) by authoritative scientific and legal writings indicating that the scientific community accepts the premises underlying the proffered testimony; and (3) by judicial opinions that indicate the expert’s premises have gained general acceptance. [ Kelly, supra, 97 N.J. at 210 , 478 A.2d 364 .]”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “essential to rebut the general misconceptions regarding battered women”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.