State v. Stroger’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2016
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fisher v. United States · Smith v. Maryland · United States v. Miller · Couch v. United States · Spevack v. Klein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“already known to exist, thereby removing any notion of compelled testimony through their production.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“never reached the Red Cross, however, because Defendant [Respondent] expended it for his personal use, embezzling the funds from his trust account [State v. Stroger, 97 N.J. 391, 397 (1984)].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Stroger“no court rule was, is or ever shall be, designed to provide confidentiality to acts discovered through disciplinary investigations when those acts amount to potential criminal conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.