Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 N.J. 99 - Faherty v. Faherty

Faherty v. Faherty’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
8
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Perini Corp. v. Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc. (1992), HOJNOWSKI EX REL. HOJNOWSKI v. Vans Skate Park (2006)

79 state decisions

33019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barcon Associates, Inc. v. Tri-County Asphalt Corp. · Communications Workers of America, Local 1087 v. Monmouth County Board of Social Services · Schlemm v. Schlemm · Crutchley v. Crutchley · 131 N.J. Super. 159 - Hudik-Ross, Inc. v. 1530 Palisade Ave. Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whenever the validity of an arbitration award affecting child support is questioned on the grounds that it does not provide adequate protection for the child, the trial court should conduct a special review of the award.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]n this sensitive and intensely private area of domestic disputes, arbitration expressly contracted for by the spouses is highly desirable.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “it may become evident that a child's best interests are as well protected by an arbitrator as by a judge.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.