Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 N.W.2d 676 - Stokes v. Dailey

Stokes v. Dailey’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
October 1985
most recently cited

1 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently October 1985

1 district · 18 state decisions

1501959196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Killmer v. Duchscherer · Otter Tail Power Company v. Malme · Tice v. Mandel · Kohler v. Stephens · Haser v. Pape

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where honest and intelligent men may fairly differ in their conclusions from the evidence upon any material fact in the case, it is for the jury to pass on such evidence. Schantz v. Northern Pacific Railway Co., 42 N.D. 377 , 173 N.W. 556 , at page 557; Stokes v. Dailey, N.D., 85 N.W.2d 745 ; Terry v. Muller, 8 Cir., 190 F.2d 170 . Stokes v. Dailey, 97 N.W.2d 676, at 682 (N.D. 1959).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.