Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 NY 132 - Durant v. . Abendroth

Durant v. . Abendroth’s Empirical Analysis

1884

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
February 1989
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1989 · most notably Gratiot County State Bank v. Johnson ex rel. St. Louis Chemical Co. (1919), City of Huntsville v. Goodenrath (1915)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions

13018841890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Durant v. . Abendroth · Robertson v. Smith · United States v. Jacob Isaac Leffler · Schwinger v. . Hickok · Chapman v. Steinmetz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Notwithstanding the erroneous statement in the affidavit as to the payment of the capital, the partnership was, in form, a limited partnership, and subject to all the rules applicable to such partnerships. If it had' undertaken to make an assignment with preferences, such assignment could not have been sustained on the ground 'of the violation of the statute. That violation could be taken advantage of only by creditors, and its consequence simply was to give them recourse against the special partner personally, as if- he had been a general partner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.