Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Ohio App. 114 - In Re Belk

97 Ohio App. 114 - In Re Belk’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2014

7 state decisions

501954196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “parent in the case of In re Zobel , 5th Dist. No. 2007AP020012, 2007-Ohio-3355 . In that case, we found the fact that the parent was not a resident of the county in which the complaint was filed did not defeat the jurisdiction of the trial court. We cited In re McLean , 11th Dist. No. 2005-T-0018, 2005-Ohio-2476 , to find that”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.