Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Ohio App. 3d 111 - State v. Depew

97 Ohio App. 3d 111 - State v. Depew’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. · Bostic v. Connor · State v. Jackson · State v. DePew · DePew v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Summary judgment in favor of the state and against a petitioner in postconviction proceedings is proper under Civ.R. 56 when (1) the state is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, (2) the state points to affirmative evidence showing no genuine issues as to any material fact, and (3) reasonable minds could come to but one conclusion, which is adverse to the [petitioner] against whom the motion is made, who is entitled to have the evidence construed most strongly in his favor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.