Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Ohio App. 3d 197 - State v. Lee

97 Ohio App. 3d 197 - State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Eley · State v. Mughni · State v. Scott · State v. Patterson · 86 Ohio App. 3d 679 - State v. Byrd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no person shall knowingly make, sell, offer to sell, or deliver any substance that he knows is a counterfeit controlled substance”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen appellant knowingly offered to sell percodan, a controlled substance, his offense was complete, under 2925.03(A)(1).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.