97 Ohio App. 3d 20 - State v. Bush’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2022
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Long · State v. Maurer · State v. Smith · State v. Landrum · State v. Underwood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may invoke the plain error rule only if we find (1) that the prosecutor's comments denied appellant a fair trial, (2) that the circumstances in the instant case are exceptional, and (3) that reversal of the judgment below is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]hen appellant stated that he had `been trying to get the money together' to hire an attorney, appellant gave the court new information concerning his ability or inability to retain counsel,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Alengi“inquire fully into the circumstances impinging on appellant's newly claimed inability to obtain counsel”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Alengi
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.