97 Ohio App. 3d 337 - State v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably State v. Echols (1998), 137 Ohio App. 3d 184 - State v. Norman (1999)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Olano · North Carolina v. Pearce · State v. Jenks · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(A) Where the same conduct by defendant can be construed to constitute two or more allied offenses of similar import, the indictment or information may contain counts for all such offenses, but the defendant may be convicted of only one. “(B) Where the defendant’s conduct constitutes two or more offenses of dissimilar import, or where his conduct results in two or more offenses of the same or similar kind committed separately or with a separate animus as to each, the indictment or information may contain counts for all such offenses, and the defendant may be convicted of all of them.””
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“`[I]t is prejudicial plain error to impose multiple sentences' because the defendant's `”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“where the defendant was charged with aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon (R.C. 2911.01 [A](1)) and robbery with force (R.C. 2911.02 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.