97 Ohio App. 3d 372 - State v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Berger v. United States · State v. Williams · State v. Apanovitch · State v. Keenan · State v. Gillard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[i]t is highly improper for any lawyer in the trial of any jury case, civil or criminal, to make what amounts to testimonial assertions under the pretext that he is merely”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Urbina“the prosecuting attorney presented damaging facts to the jury under the guise of asking appellant a question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Urbina“[t]he entire case turned on the credibility of the witnesses and who the jurors believed”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Urbina
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.