Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Ohio App. 3d 431 - Chaney v. East

97 Ohio App. 3d 431 - Chaney v. East’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2016

21 state decisions

110199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories · Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. Adams · Ostrander v. Parker-Fallis Insulation Co. · 11 Ohio App. 3d 112 - Associated Estates Corp. v. Fellows · 33 Ohio App. 3d 268 - Mahon-Evans Realty, Inc. v. Spike

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is axiomatic that the party challenging a judgment has the burden to file an adequate record with the reviewing court to exemplify its claims of error. App. R. 9 and 10; Rose v. Chevrolet, Inc. v. Adams (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 17 , 19-20 , Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 197 , 199 ; Ostrander v. Parker-Fallis Insulation Co., Inc. (1972), 29 Ohio St.2d 72 . Absent certification of an adequate record, a reviewing court must presume regularity of the proceedings and affirm the judgment of the trial court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Absent . . . an adequate record, a reviewing court must presume regularity of the proceedings and affirm the judgment of the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.