Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Ohio App. 3d 438 - State v. Collins

97 Ohio App. 3d 438 - State v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably State v. Mack (1998), State v. Green (2009)

37 state decisions

1601994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Shane · Pang v. Minch · State v. Huertas · State v. Nolton · Ohio v. Pierce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “own testimony did not support and completely undermined any claim that his actions were in fact incited by serious provocation,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “repeatedly testified he tried to avoid any fight with the victim and acted solely in self-defense 'because all I was trying to do was protect myself' "). (Emphasis sic.) {¶ 71} In light of the testimony presented, while the evidence, as found by the trial court, supported an instruction on self-defense, we find no error by the court in failing to instruct on voluntary manslaughter. See Stevenson at ¶ 25 (trial court did not err in denying request to instruct on voluntary manslaughter where appellant testified he shot victim because he "feared for his life”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Reputation or opinion. In all cases in which evidence of character or a trait of character of a person is admissible, proof may be made by testimony as to reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion. On cross-examination, inquiry is allowable into relevant specific instances of conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.