97 Ohio App. 3d 548 - State v. Daniel’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Valentine v. Konteh (2005), 120 Ohio App. 3d 122 - State v. Aldridge (1997)
8 federal appellate · 48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Jenkins · State v. Apanovitch · State v. Boston · State v. Keenan · State v. Buell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well *Page 18 established that, particularly in cases involving sexual misconduct with a child, the precise times and dates of the alleged offense or offenses oftentimes cannot be determined with specificity.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“has demonstrated that a more specific date was material to the presentation of his defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.