97 Ohio App. 3d 760 - Shaper v. Tracy’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Davis v. Michigan Department of the Treasury · Madden v. Commonwealth of Kentucky · New Energy Co. of Indiana v. Limbach · Dennis v. Higgins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The market participant doctrine recognizes that when a sovereign acts as a consumer or *Page 8 vendor in commerce, its actions as a market participant are distinct from its actions as a market regulator.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Given the lack of any precedent to apply the Commerce Clause to this type of taxation scheme, we are unable to find R.C. 5747.01 [the Ohio statute in question] unconstitutional as violative of the Commerce Clause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no provision of the Constitution of the United States ... prohibit[ed] such taxation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.