Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 OHIOST3D 303 - State v. Lott

State v. Lott’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

111
cited by 111 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
13
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 91 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 111 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2023 · most notably State v. Hancock (2006), State v. Maxwell (2014)

14 federal appellate · 91 state decisions — followed in 13 states

610200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Patterson v. New York · Atkins v. Virginia · Speiser v. Randall · State v. Perry · Ford v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “significant limitations in two or more adaptive skills, such as communication, self-care, and self-direction,”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “there is a rebuttable presumption that a defendant is not mentally retarded if his or her IQ is above 70.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]e believe that these matters should be decided by the court and do not represent a jury question.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.