Kimble v. Kimble’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
71 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably 166 Ohio App. 3d 371 - State Ex Rel. Petro v. Gold (2006), Condit v. Condit (2010)
71 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bailey v. Republic Engineered Steels, Inc. · In re Adams · Sharp v. Union Carbide Corp. · Dunaway v. Dunaway
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Pursuant to R.C. 3105.18 (E), a trial court has the authority to modify or terminate an order for alimony or spousal support only if the divorce decree contains an express reservation of jurisdiction. R.C. 3105.18 (E), applied and interpreted.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) In the case of a divorce, the decree * * * contains a provision specifically authorizing the court to modify the amount or terms of * * * spousal support.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“and a motion to terminate spousal support fell within the definition of a”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.