Douros v. Hurlburt’s Empirical Analysis
1920
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 1929
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hamlin v. Kassafer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Assuming that Philip was not a justice of the peace de jure , the record is conclusive that he was de facto. The distinction is clearly defined in Hamlin v. Kassafer , 15 Or. 456 ( 15 P. 778 , 3 Am. St. Rep. 176 ), where it is said:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holman v. Lutz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.