Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

97 P. 17

Hellman v. Longley

Decided July 21, 1908

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1908-07-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2017

1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

20190819101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1This is an appeal by the defendant Anaheim Landing, Mining, and Development Company from the judgment and from the order denying its motion for a new trial. The judgment was entered April 14, 1906. The motion for a new trial was denied and the order of denial entered October 18, 1906. Notice of appeal from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial was filed December 18, 1906. The appeal from the judgment, therefore, was taken more than six months from the date of the entry of the *79 judgment and the appeal from the order denying a new trial was taken sixty-one days after entry of the order.

¶2Upon this condition of the record respondent moves that the appeals be dismissed. No answer is made by the appellant, and, indeed, we see none that could be made; therefore, the court being without jurisdiction to entertain these appeals, it is ordered that they be, and they are, hereby dismissed.

¶3Lorigan, J., and Sloss, J., concurred.

/97/p/17 · .json · Public domain