People v. Gilmore’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2025
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Ohio v. Roberts · Idaho v. Wright · United States v. Inadi · The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent v. Wayne Robert STEWART, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increased the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Davis“Estep does not grant parties the power to intentionally forgo a timely filing when they conclude that it would be more efficient for the judiciary if they do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People Ex Rel. Mam
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.