Gonzalez v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 1993
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEW v. Jolliffe · Smith v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review · Chapman v. Commonwealth · McCurdy v. Commonwealth · Mulqueen v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e note that the [L]aw is remedial and humanitarian in purpose and its benefits and objectives are not to be frustrated ‘by slavish adherence to technical and artificial rules.’ Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Jolliffe, 474 Pa. 584, 586 , 379 A.2d 109, 110 (1977). Furthermore, to penalize the Claimant on the basis of impropriety of others would be in derogation and frustration of the primary objective of the Law to insure against ‘unemployment and the spread of indigency.’ Id. at 587 , 379 A.2d [at] 110.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.