Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 So. 3d 600 - State v. Beaudette

97 So. 3d 600 - State v. Beaudette’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
5
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Maynard v. Cartwright · United States v. Powell · Wheeler v. MO DIR. OF REVENUE · 495 So. 2d 1306 - State v. Griffin · 816 So. 2d 1272 - State v. Everett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The statute at issue gives adequate notice to individuals that certain contemplated activity is proscribed and sets forth adequate standards for determining the guilt or innocence of the accused. Although the chemical makeup of the drugs are complex, if notice is clearly given that certain forms of synthetic marijuana are illegal, then it would be easily understood and adequate notice given that other substantially similar forms of synthetic marijuana are also illegal.” 97 So. 3d at 604 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.