Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 SW3D 133 - Bland v. Dukes

Bland v. Dukes’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Archer v. State · State v. Burkhart · Stephenson v. Carlton · McConnell v. State · Hicks v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “cited Hicks with approval and affirmed that its decision did not alter `the ability of the State and defendants to use offender classification and release eligibility as subjects of plea bargain negotiations.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the plea agreement in McConnell was nullified because it was expressed in terms of the 1982 Act, not because the number of years was outside the range.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “offender classification and release eligibility”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.