Jordan v. Abney, Administrator’s Empirical Analysis
1904
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 86 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently April 1985 · most notably Sanderson v. Sanderson (1937), Jones v. Guy (1940)
2 federal appellate · 86 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That a contract between two persons upon valuable consideration, that one will, at his death, leave property to the other, is enforceable, where no statute is contravened, is held by an almost unbroken current of authority, English and American. Such contracts when sufficiently certain have been held valid and enforceable, in equity as well as at law, whether they provide for the payment of money, or the leaving of specific property, or of all or a moiety of that which the obligor should leave at his death. They have usually been put in the form of agreements to bequeath by will, but this has not been regarded' as an essential feature; agreements to leave the property, or that the obligee should have it, at' the death of the obligor, being held sufficient,””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gerlich v. Myers“"This right (adoption) arises by operation of law from the acts of the parties made in compliance with the statute, and does not depend on, or arise from, contract."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moorman v. Hunnicutt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.