Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 U.S. 181 - Lamborn v. County Commissioners

Lamborn v. County Commissioners’s Empirical Analysis

97 U.S. 181 · 1877

Citation profile

121
cited by 121 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
23
states following
March 1986
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 6 district · 62 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 121 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1986 · most notably Ward v. Board of County Com'rs of Love County Okl (1920), Atchison Topeka Santa Fe Railway Company v. Timothy O'Connor (1912)

21 federal appellate · 6 district · 62 state decisions — followed in 23 states

260187718801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nelson Elliott v. Samuel Swartwout · Clement Hunt v. Christopher Rhodes · Railway Company v. Prescott · Carithers v. Weaver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where a party pays an illegal demand with a full knowledge of all the facts which render such demand illegal, without an immediate and urgent necessity therefor, or unless-to release his person or property from detention, or to prevent an immediate seizure of his person or property, such payment must be deemed to be voluntary, and cannot be recovered back. And the fact that the party at the time of making the payment files a written protest does not make the payment involuntary.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It is settled by many authorities that money paid by a person to prevent an illegal seizure of his person or property by an officer claiming authority to seize the same, or to liberate his person or property from illegal detention by such officer, may be recovered back, in an action for money had and received, on the ground that the payment was compulsory, or by duress or extortion.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““A voluntary payment made with the full, knowledge of all the facts and circumstances of the case, though made under a mistaken view of the law, cannot be revoked, and the money so paid cannot be recovered back.” Citing case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.