Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Utah 443 - State v. Pettit

State v. Pettit’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 1979
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1979

3 state decisions

1019391940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Pay · State v. Nelson · State v. Leek · State v. Hale · State v. McIntyre

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The code of criminal procedure is not designed to eliminate essential averments or to permit the pleading of misleading factual data, whether or not it was done knowingly.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.