Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Wash. 2d 528 - State v. Stockton

97 Wash. 2d 528 - State v. Stockton’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably 127 Wash. 2d 322 - State v. McFarland (1995), 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway (1988)

34 state decisions

1801982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 93 Wash. 2d 510 - State v. Shipp · 81 Wash. 2d 215 - Dean v. McFarland · 92 Wash. 2d 35 - State Ex Rel. McDonald v. Whatcom County District Court · 87 Wash. 2d 887 - Retail Store Employees Union, Local 1001 v. Washington Surveying & Rating Bureau · 16 Wash. App. 341 - State v. Stevenson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The ejusdem generis rule requires that general terms appearing in a statute in connection with specific terms are to be given meaning and effect only to the extent that the general terms suggest items similar to those designated by the specific terms. In short, spe cific terms modify or restrict the application of general terms where both are used in sequence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Matters referred to in the brief but not included in the record cannot be considered on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.