Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Wash. 2d 562 - State v. Loewen

97 Wash. 2d 562 - State v. Loewen’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

95
cited by 95 later decisions
7
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 90 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably 109 Wash. 2d 107 - Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply System (1988), State v. Ladson (1999)

2 federal appellate · 90 state decisions

3201982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Chimel v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “actually motivated by a perceived need to render aid or assistance.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “First, the search is invalid unless the searching officer is actually motivated by a perceived need to render aid or assistance. Second, even though the requisite motivation is found to exist, until it can be found that a reasonable person under the circumstances would have thought an emergency existed, the search is invalid.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “To approve the use of evidence of some offense unrelated to weapons would be to invite the use of weapons[] searches as a pretext for unwarranted searches, and thus to severely erode the protection of the Fourth Amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.