Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Wash. 2d 646 - Snohomish County v. State

97 Wash. 2d 646 - Snohomish County v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1989
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rutgers v. Piluso · 63 Wash. 2d 664 - Lenci v. City of Seattle · Aviation Services, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment of Hanover Tp. · City of Scottsdale v. Municipal Court of Tempe · 60 Wash. 2d 397 - State v. Lundquist

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`... the ordinance permits or licenses that which the statute forbids and prohibits, and vice versa... Judged by such a test, an ordinance is in conflict if it forbids that which the statute permits'.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.