97 Wash. 2d 846 - State v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 3001 · 38 U.S.C. § 3107
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 87 Wash. 2d 374 - State v. Arndt · 93 Wash. 2d 510 - State v. Shipp · Theis v. duPont, Glore Forgan Inc. · 94 Wash. 2d 839 - State v. Ermert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a limited power of attorney conveys only the authority expressed therein.” 97 Wn.2d at 851 . However, the power of attorney in this case is silent about whether Cascade had authority to receive notice on National’s behalf. Given the sort of authority the power of attorney does expressly convey, it is not unreasonable to assume that receiving notice for National on matters involving Parada’s bond was part of Cascade’s function in carrying out its obligations under the power of attorney. See Walker, 68 Wn.2d at 351 (an agent’s authority”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"Income"—All appreciable gains in real or personal property (cash or kind) or other assets, which are received by or become available for use and enjoyment by an applicant or recipient after applying for or receiving public assistance: . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“manner, which is equivalent to the present mental state of knowledge. No mention is made of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.