Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Wash. 2d 873 - State v. Brooks

97 Wash. 2d 873 - State v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably State v. Pirtle (1995), 119 Wash. 2d 294 - State v. Ortiz (1992)

3 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

2001982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 95 Wash. 2d 616 - State v. Jones · 24 Wash. App. 495 - State v. King · State v. Rutten · 38 Wash. 2d 446 - State v. Rio · 5 Wash. App. 802 - State v. Carter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the mental process of thinking beforehand, deliberation, reflection, weighing or reasoning for a period of time, however short.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'acting with the objective or purpose to accomplish a result which constitutes a crime”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “No act committed by a person while in a state of voluntary intoxication is less criminal by reason of that condition, but whenever the actual existence of any particular mental state is a necessary element to constitute a particular kind or degree of crime, the fact of intoxication may be taken into consideration in determining such mental state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.