97 Wash. App. 101 - State v. Borrero’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2021
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 125 Wash. 2d 782 - State v. Vangerpen · 113 Wash. 2d 679 - State v. Leach · 119 Wash. 2d 143 - State v. Johnson · 123 Wash. 2d 467 - State v. Dent · State v. Moavenzadeh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The purpose of a jury instruction is to provide the jury with the applicable law to be applied in the case. On the other hand, the purpose of an information is to give a defendant notice of the crime with which he or she is charged. Because of these different purposes, jury instructions must necessarily contain more complete and precise statements of the law than are required in an information.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rivas · State v. Borrero“[The defendant] with premeditated intent to cause the death of another person did attempt to cause the death of Leslie Lemieux, a human being.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Borrero“Webster's Third New International Dictionary 140 (1993). Synonyms of”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Borrero
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.