97 Wash. App. 144 - State v. Longshore’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2002
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United Families of America v. Kendrick · Shively v. Bowlby · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas · Merrit Martin v. William C Waddell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The appeals court ignored this testimony, labeling [it] as not objective, the opinion of a particular person, hypothetical, and not based upon `expertise or knowledge of wholesale market values for shellfish.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Longshore“`over ... things so closely related to the soil as clams.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Longshore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.