97 Wash. App. 161 - State v. Edelman’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
September 2016
most recently cited
26 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3663
Relies on 116 Wash. 2d 917 - State v. Davison · State v. Moen · State v. Enstone · 99 Wash. 2d 75 - State v. Barr · 78 Wash. App. 870 - State v. Martinez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[U]nder the sentencing reform act, restitution is part of an offender's sentence and is primarily punitive in nature.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The modification urged by the State does not award compensation for any additional loss, but continues to represent the amount that [the defendant] embezzled from [the victim].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. People“In this situation, modifying the designated payee under the order does not change the nature of the defendant's obligation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. People
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.