State v. Sulayman’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. Thomas · 100 Wash. 2d 508 - State v. Phelan · Sherman v. State · State v. Blank · 119 Wash. 2d 204 - State v. Speaks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[6] Our analysis in Randle's ex post facto claim is equally applicable to Sulayman's due process claim. Similarly, in State v. Cruz, [7] we evaluated the revised”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sulayman“Had he not committed another crime after 1989, the amendment would have had no affect on him at all.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sulayman“[14] credit is not constitutionally mandated for”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sulayman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.