Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 WASHAPP 273 - State v. K.E.

State v. K.E.’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 117 Wash. 2d 211 - State v. Grewe · 122 Wash. 2d 502 - State v. Gaines · State v. Ha'Mim · 67 Wash. App. 800 - State v. SS · 37 Wash. App. 773 - State v. P.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] juvenile court may impose a downward exceptional disposition where the court finds that a standard range disposition would constitute excessive punishment because the standard range is not needed to rehabilitate the juvenile offender or protect the public from criminal behavior.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Indeed, to impose an excessive penalty on a juvenile in light of the purposes of the Juvenile Justice Act would be to defeat the very definition of `manifest injustice,' and would presumably be to the detriment of that juvenile.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “impose an excessive penalty on the juvenile or would impose a serious, and clear danger to society in light of the purposes of this chapter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.