97 Wash. App. 479 - State v. Bryant’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2020
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Kastigar v. United States · Hoffman v. United States · Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. Bouknight · Mullins Coal Co. v. Director
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The statutory grant of `use immunity' is not as comprehensive as the protection afforded by the Fifth Amendment privilege since it does not preclude the derivative use of the fruits of the compelled testimony as investigatory leads which might supply other means of incriminating the witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In essence, use and derivative use immunity leave the witness, and the government, in the same situation they would have been in had the witness not given a statement or testified.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“utilized by law enforcement to find additional evidence to use against [him].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bryant
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.