State v. Whelchel’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2011
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Solem v. Helm · 120 Wash. 2d 585 - State v. Greenwood · 87 Wash. 2d 870 - State v. Striker · 115 Wash. 2d 708 - State v. Whelchel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as required by our state procedures. Rather, as noted above, the federal proceedings are directed to a penitentiary superintendent primarily for the purpose of releasing a person held in custody. As such, the federal proceedings are not mainly directed at the State and its executive agents to require another prosecution under state law or the trial court or its clerk for administration of state criminal laws and procedures. Next, we consider whether the federal district court constitutes an”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. WHELECHEL“(4) Trial After Appeal or Stay. If a cause is remanded for trial after an appellate court accepts review or stays proceedings, the defendant shall be brought to trial not later than 60 days after ... receipt by the clerk of the superior court of the mandate or other written order, if after such appearance the defendant is detained in jail, or not later than 90 days after such appearance if the defendant is thereafter released whether or not subject to conditions of release.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. WHELECHEL“If it does apply, it requires that there be filed with the clerk of this court a copy of the order, in essence a mandate saying here's what the higher court has done. That has still not occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. WHELECHEL
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.