97 Wash. App. 865 - State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
23 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Alaska · 125 Wash. 2d 847 - State v. Lough · 99 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Hudlow · 87 Wash. 2d 85 - Fenimore v. Donald M. Drake Construction Co. · 94 Wash. 2d 733 - State v. Demos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial judge, not an appellate court, is in the best position to evaluate the dynamics of a jury trial and therefore the prejudicial effect of a piece of evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Posey“Evidence tending to establish a party's theory, or to qualify or disprove the testimony of an adversary, is always relevant and admissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Posey“its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Posey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.