97 Wash. App. 935 - State v. Fulps’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2000
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · 123 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Hill · 120 Wash. 2d 585 - State v. Greenwood · 120 Wash. 2d 822 - State v. Blackwell · Gardner v. Loomis Armored, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no specific order for release is set forth in the form or can be found in this record. The form and the procedure used to secure release are thus, conspicuously deficient under CrR 3.2.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fulps“if no information has been filed by the time set for release or reappearance. CrR 3.2B(c)(2). But the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fulps“shall be brought to trial not later than 90 days after the date of arraignment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fulps
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.