Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

970 F.2d 1378

Docket No. 88-4103.

Ayers v. Fordice

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Aug. 18, 1992.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-08-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1992

1 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Fordice · Ayers v. Allain · Ayers v. Allain

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1992-08-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Robert Pressman, Center for Law & Educ., Cambridge, Mass., Alvin 0. Cham-bliss, Oxford, Miss., for Ayers, et al.

¶2*1379Linda F. Thome, Jessica Dunsay Silver, Attys., Appellate Sect., Civ. Rights Div., Dept, of Justice, Nathaniel Douglas, John R. Moore, Levern M. Younger, Franz R. Marshall, Zita Johnson-Betts, Attys., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Civ. Rts. Div., Educ. Opportunities Litigation Sec., Roger Clegg, Deputy Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., for U.S.

¶3Mike Moore, Atty. Gen., William F. Goodman, Jr., Paul Stephenson, Ed Davis Noble, Jr., Jackson, Miss., for defendants-appel-lees.

¶4ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

¶5Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, GOLDBERG, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM:

¶7This Court, sitting en banc,1 affirmed the judgment of the district court in Ayers v. Allain, 674 F.Supp. 1523 (N.D.Miss.1987). On appeal the United States Supreme Court found2 that we and the district court had applied the incorrect legal standard, vacated our decision and remanded the matter to this Court. Accordingly,' we vacate the decision of the district court and remand this matter to it for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

¶8VACATED and REMANDED.

/970/f2d/1378 · .json · Public domain