Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 970 F.2d 1397 - United States v. Simon Edward Heath and Paul Sau-Ki Cheng

United States v. Simon Edward Heath and Paul Sau-Ki Cheng’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
3
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

48 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably United States v. Brandon (1994), United States v. Kimbrough (1995)

48 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

4501992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1006 · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 657

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Allen v. United States · Palmer v. Hoffman · Santoni v. United States · Kungys v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “integrally related; one could not have succeeded without the other”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Indeed, juries are free to use their common sense and apply common knowledge, observation, and experience gained in the ordinary affairs of life when giving affect to the inferences that may reasonably be drawn from the evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A] concealment or misrepresentation is material `if it has a natural tendency to influence, or was capable of influencing, the decision of' the decisionmaker to which it was addressed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.