Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 970 F.2d 1490 - United States v. Davern

United States v. Davern’s Empirical Analysis

970 F.2d 1490 · 1992

Citation profile

99
cited by 99 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 2014
most recently cited

76 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 99 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2014 · most notably United States v. Watts (1997), United States v. Silverman (1992)

76 federal appellate · 1 district ·

900199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Mistretta v. United States · Tumey v. State of Ohio · In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites · Mempa v. Rhay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The law in this Circuit is clear that a base offense level is determined by the amount of drugs included in the defendant's relevant conduct, not just amounts in the offense of conviction or charged in the indictment.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that there exists an aggravating or mitigating circumstance of a kind, or to a degree not adequately taken into consideration by the Sentencing Commission in formulating the guidelines.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in a drug distribution case, quantities and types of drugs not specified in the count of conviction are to be included in determining the offense level if they were part of a common scheme or plan as the count of conviction.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.