27 536 74764 Hunter Shipshewana State Bank’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably United States v. Lane (2003), Airadigm Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (2008)
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522
Relies on Shaffer v. Heitner · Rush v. Savchuk · Brewer v. United States · Baginsky v. United States · Escambia County v. McMillan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under this section, two alternative sets of exemptions are created. Subsection 522(b)(1) affords the debtor the federal exemptions set forth in subsection 522(d); alternatively,- under subsection 522(b)(2), the debtor may choose the exemptions provided by his domicile state along with exemptions provided by federal, non-Code bankruptcy law (e.g., the social security payment exemption, 42 U.S.C. § 407 , and veterans benefits exemption, 38 U.S.C. § 1970 (g))____ The Code also allows individual states to take this choice away from the debtor by “opting out” of the federal exemptions altogether. See 11 U.S.C. § 522 (b)(1).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The purpose of the amendment was to clarify that discharge precludes only actions to establish personal liability, not actions to enforce a lien against property of the debtor. Cases and commentators agree that Congress intended to resolve the apparent inconsistency between section 524(a)(2) and other portions of the Code, such as section 506(d) — which allows certain liens to pass through bankruptcy unaffected— and section 522(c)(2) — which states that exempt property is still subject to certain liens....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]ny interest the judgment debtor has in real estate held as a tenant by the entireties on the date of the filing of the petition for relief under the bankruptcy code, unless a joint petition for relief is filed by the judgment debtor and spouse, or individual petitions of the judgment debtor and spouse are subsequently consolidated.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.